The following comments are owned by the user that posted them. BC Files is not responsible for their content.
Total comments: 29 | Last comment: 02-23-2008 at 14:06
lukerobin
From: 
Joined: April 10th, 2007
Posts: 331 | Yay i'm so glad I got this. |
USS_Falcon
From:  (Ontario)
Joined: February 21st, 2006
Posts: 13 | my god that's amazing!! 10/10 |
acidfluxxbass
From: (Portsmouth)
Joined: August 16th, 2007
Posts: 1627 | wow really good!
no impuse lights?
10 |
trekky74205
Joined: October 9th, 2006
Posts: 34 | ZOMG WOW!
Thats so awesome i love it 60/10 |
lukerobin
From:
Joined: April 10th, 2007
Posts: 331 | Thanks. @#3 The Enterprise never has it's impulse lights on. Here's the origional shot showing it. http://tng.trekcore.com/gallery/albums/s2/2x13/timesquared270.jpg Also note that the angle on mine isn't cannon but myself I think it looks better. Also some credit must go to BonesMcCoy since he created the background using images I gave him. |
Saquist
From:  (Houston Texas)
Joined: September 18th, 2003
Posts: 1810 | Please! Stop complaining about impulse lights and just watch some TNG.
I'm just astonished that this keeps coming up...
Incredible pic...Good Job Luke....
10/10 |
Minstrel_in_the_Gallery
From: (Cambridge, Ontario)
Joined: June 3rd, 2007
Posts: 162 | The only time the saucer impulse engines shoul be active is when the vessel is operating in Separated Flight Mode. Otherwise, they're not activated because the impulse engine on the spine of the engineering hull's neck is powerful enough to move the vessel on its own.
Plus, the non-TNG Technical Manual would probably be that it's cheaper to light one engine for TV than three. ;P |
Freakman
From:
Joined: November 14th, 2005
Posts: 619 | Wow, this does look better than canon. That vortex is sweet.  If this was ever added to BC, I'd die of excitement. 10/10 |
Tych
From: (MA)
Joined: December 7th, 2004
Posts: 116 | Wow, excellent 10/10! |
Rocket112
Joined: April 6th, 2006
Posts: 21 | Looks really great. Just not one of my favourites.
I'll give it 9/10. |
bimkins
Joined: February 21st, 2004
Posts: 49 | The only way I know that this isn't an episode screen cap is that this pic looks WAY BETTER than the show!
Excellent pic. 
10/10 |
denster
Joined: July 17th, 2004
Posts: 338 | I'm like the recreation, 7/10  |
ekbalam
From: (Amarillo, TX)
Joined: December 7th, 2006
Posts: 731 | 10/10! Another one in a row! Great!! |
Chris91
Joined: April 13th, 2003
Posts: 1249 | Not meaning to say it's done exactly the same because, as Lukerobin said, he didn't want to. But it's close enough for me to see this a faithful recreation done in a little better way, perhaps. I'd like to see some of the blue glow reflecting on the Enterprise's hull, but I guess that because of some of the strictest PotD rules here (and I'm not complaining, just noting) it can't be helped and thus wouldn't count as a serious contradiction.
Rating: 9/10 - It's not perfect even if setting aside one possible fault, but what Potd is? Nevertheless it's another great PotD and one of the few recent ones I would hold as a favorite for this year thus far. |
Liquid_Wolf
From:
Joined: September 11th, 2004
Posts: 1572 | O sweeet ! i love it plane and simple 10/10 |
Jeybyrd
Joined: February 14th, 2003
Posts: 30 | Another 10/10
|
DJ_Curtis
Joined: March 2nd, 2006
Posts: 259 | Lukerobin, when my galaxy is done, you'll have to do this again. |
DarkKrucifix7
From:
Joined: December 30th, 2006
Posts: 147 | awesome! i love the vortex effect *places as wallpaper* |
The_Undertone
From: (Suffolk)
Joined: April 8th, 2006
Posts: 249 | That my fine sir, is very smart indeed! Nicely done, looks like a shot straight outta DS9!
(Although I know it's TNG) 10/10  |
JeanLucPicard1
From: (Wakefield, RI)
Joined: June 16th, 2005
Posts: 265 | I remember this episode. "The cycle must end" Very realistic recreation. Did make it using a modified slipstream, or another photo editor?
10/10 |
lukerobin
From:
Joined: April 10th, 2007
Posts: 331 | Thanks all for the great comments.
@#14: I might actually try doing this again and add some blue glow to the textures of the ship. That way it would be a 100% BC screenshot.
@#20: Well it's a modified slipstream that, i'm guessing, was made in photoshop. If you want to know more about it and how to use it just go here http://bc-central.com/forums/index.php?topic=1433.360
@#17: I would be honoured to do this again with your Galaxy. It is looking more and more awsome every day. |
lukerobin
From:
Joined: April 10th, 2007
Posts: 331 | BTW: @#3,6,7 i'm pretty sure that the only Galaxy's with the impulse on are the Venture refits or when a normal one has seperated it's saucer. |
DoomRaiden
From:  (Cork)
Joined: October 8th, 2007
Posts: 489 | that is a great pic m8, nd to mention the size of it lol. 10/10 |
NIKIN
Joined: December 4th, 2006
Posts: 100 | I think this is a great recreation, in fact I prefer the look of it with the angle of the enterprise than the original
10/10 |
tomcattweek01
From: (Florida)
Joined: January 18th, 2007
Posts: 32 | Like everybody else has stated, sweet pic. 10/10 |
nexxus21
From: (Texas)
Joined: July 26th, 2003
Posts: 176 | Excellent picture of the day! Especially like the angle and clarity...This just became my new desktop wallpaper.... |
lukerobin
From:
Joined: April 10th, 2007
Posts: 331 | Wow thanks #23,24,25,26. I've got another one which is from the front of the ship that I actually think is better. Hopefully that'll become POTD soon. |
Dr_McCoy11
From:  (Legnica)
Joined: February 5th, 2006
Posts: 1035 | As I said on BCC this pic is one of the best recreations ever made, and it has one of the top ratings, good job luke 10/10 from me
btw. yeah the one from the front will rock and for sure will get even better ratings keep them coming mate ! |
lukerobin
From:
Joined: April 10th, 2007
Posts: 331 | Hey thanks Doc. It wouldn't be possible without ya. |
When posting comments, you must follow these rules:- No "Yay I got First Post!" posts, no exceptions and no matter what other content the post has!
- No Pornographic Material. Any sexually oriented imagery or links to such content will not be tolerated.
- No Warez or Illegal Software. This includes linking to software, posting about it, and suggesting to get it.
- No Cursing or Swear words. We encourage you to use our comment sections as a forum to debate files, news, etc., but please use proper adjectives to express yourself. We will not tolerate abuse upon another member or author.
- No Attacks / Retaliation of any kind against a member, or group of members.
- Please do not advertise for other sites or forums here.
- Maximum of 3 smileys per regular member.
The high interactivity of this site should be considered a luxury, not a right. If you cannot follow these simple rules, you can and will be warned or banned from the comments, site or the entire network for any period of time.
Now enjoy yourself and behave!
|
