The following comments are owned by the user that posted them. BC Files is not responsible for their content.
Total comments: 22 | Last comment: 04-18-2009 at 18:34
jacobdrj
Joined: March 19th, 2006
Posts: 171 | ...And Personal...
Nice beauty shot. You can see the whole ship, in your face style, but not too close that you can't appreciate the forest from the trees. Another solid 8/10 |
SelorKiith
From:  (Wuppertal (NRW))
Joined: September 26th, 2007
Posts: 10 | Very nice! Can't wait to see something similar to this on the Big Screen  |
skills2k6
Joined: October 14th, 2005
Posts: 62 | shame about the inferior connie refit lol, 10/10 for the effort taken and the spacedock |
SpotFTW
Joined: February 28th, 2009
Posts: 3 | Its a good shot, looks cool, but the only problem is that in the movie the ship was built on Earth, in Iowa, as stupid as that is. Maybe a good title for this would have been "how it should be built" or something of that sort. Still, the ship's growing on me, considering I wanted to kill JJ after first seeing it. Excellent model either way, and good angle for the shot. |
Spengleres
From:
Joined: February 28th, 2006
Posts: 3 | What does this "thing" in a Startrek Spacedock.
This is not the Enterprise, this is not Startrek |
stereojesus
From: 
Joined: August 8th, 2007
Posts: 87 | Spengleres settle down, its just a tv show.
nice picture! 10/10 |
Grodie
From: (Kansas)
Joined: February 26th, 2006
Posts: 596 | It is a pretty picture. When I first saw this new enterprise, I hated it with a passion. However as I saw it more and more, it grew on me. Most insidious ship design ever!
10/10 |
ekbalam
From: (Amarillo, TX)
Joined: December 7th, 2006
Posts: 731 | @4, this wasn't intended to be where she was built. I figured the process of getting her from the assembly yards in Iowa to space is tricky so once in orbit she'd dock waiting for the full crew.
Thanks all for the comments! |
BLasToFF
Joined: August 21st, 2007
Posts: 435 | @SpotFTW
As against the movie as I am, I must point out that even though it was built on Earth, it
has to reach space at one point, and I doubt when it was sent up into space, it had
every last member of the crew onboard. It probably docked with the station to make
any last minute refits or modifications along with crew and personal transfers.
Not a bad picture. Thx to Wiley, I'm starting to like the ship a bit more, the bulbus
nacells are still a bit akward to me though. Thats not wiley's fault, and its certainly not
ekbalams fault either. I do like the premise of this shot though. I'll give it a good 8/10.
but 10/10 to kill off the 1 voters. Nice POTD. |
Liquid_Wolf
From: 
Joined: September 11th, 2004
Posts: 1572 | v nice i like it 10 / 10 |
ussbaldeagle
From: (easton,pa)
Joined: March 16th, 2006
Posts: 11 | WAY BETTER THAN THAN THE OLD CONNIE AND THE NEW TREK MOVIE IS GONNA GROSS HUGE PROFIT
since it is hard to express emotion while making typed comments, MANY people Regard All Caps As Shouting. -tiq- |
kirk2164
Joined: February 25th, 2007
Posts: 340 | CAPS LOCK IS CRUISE CONTROL FOR COOL!!
since it is hard to express emotion while making typed comments, MANY people Regard All Caps As Shouting. -tiq- |
MJAY
From: (Fort Lauderdale, Florida (home of high mortgage rates))
Joined: October 26th, 2002
Posts: 939 | Hey, don't diss his enthusiasm.
That excitement can help him attract ladies, so dont stifle it. lol
I always imagined Federation ships of this particular class, or larger, as being too large for construction on the surface.
Seems impractical to build it on the surface.
7/10 |
k_merse
From:  (Budapest)
Joined: August 27th, 2007
Posts: 199 | Impractical and absolutely uncanon. Even the NX-01 was built in the space.
This new movie will suck. But still, the picture is great. |
edors
Joined: May 6th, 2006
Posts: 16 | Whats the problem with it being built on Earth? I mean, its probally acturally easier to build it on Earth, and we know ships of a similar size (Voyager for one) can take off from planetary surfaces, be it 100 years later, but i dont imagine that abillitty being new then...
anyway, 10/10 |
edors
Joined: May 6th, 2006
Posts: 16 | I noticed that the shuttle is a ROS shuttle rather than the movie version, does anyone have a movie version of the shuttle in production? |
RMGRibeiro
From:  (Lisboa)
Joined: April 11th, 2009
Posts: 32 | Very cool pic |
pokemona
From:  (Barrie, Ontario)
Joined: November 25th, 2002
Posts: 809 | Frakking love this design of the enterprise, I'm so going to see the movie. Hmm... I have this sudden erg to watch some TOS, and TOS movies.
10/10 |
cherch
From: (california)
Joined: October 15th, 2005
Posts: 23 | the problem with the conie landing on a plant and being built even on the planet is the nacelles wouldn’t hold up they’d come crashing down not to mention the only part cannon of the conie that could land on the surface was the saucer section when it separated from the star drive, the ship would have to be built in space to keep structural integrity, and for this movie being an alternate time line story I still have my doubts. (see the star trek comic book Count down the offical precral to the movie. with captin data in command of the enterprie -E : ) ) |
ekbalam
From: (Amarillo, TX)
Joined: December 7th, 2006
Posts: 731 | @19, if that were the case, then forget all those high impulse manuevers, orbiting stars, or let alone the slingshot around the sun.
Maybe unpowered it wouldn't hold up, but isn't that one of the purposes of a structural integrity field? |
Fireyone
Joined: May 17th, 2006
Posts: 136 | WAY WORSE THAN THAN THE OLD CONNIE AND THE NEW TREK MOVIE IS GONNA GROSS HUGE PROFIT.
-Fixed that for ya. |
billyboyjennings
From:
Joined: June 11th, 2006
Posts: 461 | The parts were made on Earth, THEN they were sent up into orbit and put together in spacedock. So yes the ship was built in San Francisco and put together in space. |
When posting comments, you must follow these rules:- No "Yay I got First Post!" posts, no exceptions and no matter what other content the post has!
- No Pornographic Material. Any sexually oriented imagery or links to such content will not be tolerated.
- No Warez or Illegal Software. This includes linking to software, posting about it, and suggesting to get it.
- No Cursing or Swear words. We encourage you to use our comment sections as a forum to debate files, news, etc., but please use proper adjectives to express yourself. We will not tolerate abuse upon another member or author.
- No Attacks / Retaliation of any kind against a member, or group of members.
- Please do not advertise for other sites or forums here.
- Maximum of 3 smileys per regular member.
The high interactivity of this site should be considered a luxury, not a right. If you cannot follow these simple rules, you can and will be warned or banned from the comments, site or the entire network for any period of time.
Now enjoy yourself and behave!
|
