The following comments are owned by the user that posted them. BC Files is not responsible for their content.
Total comments: 24 | Last comment: 07-23-2008 at 08:38
traveler
From:  (San Diego)
Joined: May 4th, 2004
Posts: 44 | David better have one hell of a rock in his sling. |
Forty_Seven
Joined: September 13th, 2005
Posts: 49 | Love the phases going out at all those crazy angles |
laguardia528
From: (Boise, Idaho)
Joined: February 28th, 2008
Posts: 151 | awesome shot! a little blurry but other than that top notch. 10/10 from me. |
Liquid_Wolf
From: 
Joined: September 11th, 2004
Posts: 1572 | 1 word ... WOW 10/10 |
kirk2164
Joined: February 25th, 2007
Posts: 340 | Epic, very nice. No nitpicks here. 10/10 |
FourChan
Joined: May 26th, 2008
Posts: 279 | Nice 10/10 |
Lennis
From: (Springfield, Missouri)
Joined: October 13th, 2004
Posts: 163 | This is an epic shot. There's just no escaping a Federation phaser array. |
josephdavis
From:
Joined: January 2nd, 2006
Posts: 413 | wow never seen the klingons so details ace shot |
dutzu
From:  (Bucharest)
Joined: November 13th, 2007
Posts: 354 | Either the enterprise can't lock on to it's targets and fireing blind, or there are more than the two goliaths we see. Well put "david vs the goliaths" as in plural because I thin it would have handeled one of those ships easy. And with a good crew maybe managed even two. |
Myxale
From: 
Joined: December 16th, 2004
Posts: 272 | Like I already said "epic" stuff there flux!
9/10 |
BLasToFF
Joined: August 21st, 2007
Posts: 435 | Nice shot. I'll stop whining about the aztech'ing cause I'll start sounding like a broken
record, so I wont even mark it down for that anymore (not that I ever did, cause its
never the POTD poster's fault). So anyways, nothing really wrong, cept maybe the
formation is a bit too close, but ah well. Almost makes them more menacing that way.
Something feels missing, not sure though. I'll just mark it as 10/10. Good going. |
Kakashi971
From: (Indiana)
Joined: March 9th, 2007
Posts: 740 | i love it this rules 10/10 |
Jeybyrd
Joined: February 14th, 2003
Posts: 30 | 'Love this action shot. |
Riker_E
Joined: July 29th, 2007
Posts: 50 | I think i'd be saying:
"Computer, activate auto-destruct, authorization Riker tango 11 alpha zero" "All hands abandon ship" |
hushryguy21
Joined: December 25th, 2003
Posts: 40 | Full axis rotation to port fire all ventral phasers and initiate Riker maneuver! Nice pic! What model are the Klingon ships. |
FluxCapacitor
From: (Concord, CA)
Joined: February 15th, 2008
Posts: 29 | Thanks for the props, guys. The Klingon ships are the Deathwing-class which can be found here: http://drs.battleclinic.com/downloads/bc/bc.htm
I''m not sur eif you can tell from the screenshot but compared to the already massive Enterprise-F, those Deathwings are HUGE. The website states their length as being 1,370m. They pack quite a punch. |
N1GH7H4WK
From: 
Joined: February 23rd, 2006
Posts: 475 | would have been a good "All Good Things..." concept in its time
10/10 |
MJAY
From: (Fort Lauderdale, Florida (home of high mortgage rates))
Joined: October 26th, 2002
Posts: 939 | Lol wow.
Just the title alone got my attention.
@ #9: This ship is Century (the first of its class). Not Enterprise. Century in it's finest hour I'm afraid...
@ #14: That strategy would guarantee your defeat (not your victory) I'm afraid. Never forget Klingon's rarely (if ever) take prisoners. They'd most likely kill your crew, and hold YOU (the captain) captive, as means for some other ends.
On a technical note, I would conclude that there are at least 3 more starships engaging the Century. She has two phaser volleys going off screen in opposite arcs from her dorsal saucer array, possibly intended to hit 2 more off-screen Deathwings; and her two dorsal pylon arrays are shooting straight "up" at what (judging from the beam angles) could be another (and third off-screen) Deathwing.
Most've been a cool fight. I would love to have seen a video of this match.
10/10 |
dutzu
From: (Bucharest)
Joined: November 13th, 2007
Posts: 354 | Maybe u don't use this ship, but the Enterprise F is Century class. Even when the author talks about the size he refers to it as the Enterprise-F. |
dutzu
From: (Bucharest)
Joined: November 13th, 2007
Posts: 354 | Although by the nacelles it does look like the Century. |
FluxCapacitor
From: (Concord, CA)
Joined: February 15th, 2008
Posts: 29 | Yeah, I forgot that it is indeed the Century and not the Enterprise...whoops.  |
MJAY
From: (Fort Lauderdale, Florida (home of high mortgage rates))
Joined: October 26th, 2002
Posts: 939 | I know DJ released the Century before the Enterprise, she didn't get as much fanfare of course, but she is still just as nice as Enterprise.
http://bridgecommander.filefront.com/file/Century_Class_USS_Century;85708
And here's Enterprise if anyone (God knows why) hasn't downloaded it yet...
http://bridgecommander.filefront.com/file/Century_Class_USS_EnterpriseF;82748
They're both extremely beautiful ships. Same hardpoint I think. And they both have cosmetic differences that suit them. Like a pair of beautiful twins with only the smallest differences.
Enterprise's deflector has a blue glow. Century's deflector has a gold glow.
Enterprise's nacelles seem to have more armor. Century's nacelles are as you see above, also it's bussards have a darker red hue than Enterprise.
Gorgeous ships.
Enterprise has roughly 7 times more downloads than Century! Come on ppl! Wake up and download this beautiful ship! (link 1) |
pokemona
From:  (Barrie, Ontario)
Joined: November 25th, 2002
Posts: 809 | Actually the Enterprise came out before the Century.
Sweet shot. 10/10 |
MJAY
From: (Fort Lauderdale, Florida (home of high mortgage rates))
Joined: October 26th, 2002
Posts: 939 | Enterprise = september '07
Century = january '08
thats what I get for passing over the read-mes! |
When posting comments, you must follow these rules:- No "Yay I got First Post!" posts, no exceptions and no matter what other content the post has!
- No Pornographic Material. Any sexually oriented imagery or links to such content will not be tolerated.
- No Warez or Illegal Software. This includes linking to software, posting about it, and suggesting to get it.
- No Cursing or Swear words. We encourage you to use our comment sections as a forum to debate files, news, etc., but please use proper adjectives to express yourself. We will not tolerate abuse upon another member or author.
- No Attacks / Retaliation of any kind against a member, or group of members.
- Please do not advertise for other sites or forums here.
- Maximum of 3 smileys per regular member.
The high interactivity of this site should be considered a luxury, not a right. If you cannot follow these simple rules, you can and will be warned or banned from the comments, site or the entire network for any period of time.
Now enjoy yourself and behave!
|
