|
The following comments are owned by the user that posted them. BC Files is not responsible for their content.
Total comments: 16 | Last comment: 08-04-2005 at 08:32
master_merlin From: (Roosevelt, UT) Joined: July 20th, 2005 Posts: 2 | Cool!
I wonder what they will call it. This is a good set of news |
Danar Joined: December 28th, 2002 Posts: 77 | The IAU (International Astronomical Union) has to be the one to officially designate any discovered body as a planet or not. Even NASA referred to it as a tenth planet, or so I heard, but they don't have the authority to decide that. It remains to be seen whether or not the IAU will designate this as a planet. No one knows, but I personally feel that they will not choose to call this a planet, despite its size. It's really just a very large Kuiper Belt Object in a wildly inclined orbit. It's like a bigger Pluto, but Pluto should only be considered a planet for historical and sentimental reasons. These stories were rushed out the door because a hacker found the info and was about to release it himself. I would bet that if they had been able to take their time in releasing this they wouldn't have called it a planet but waited instead on an official decision by the IAU. |
starforce2 From: (Minnesota) Joined: May 4th, 2003 Posts: 775 | where'd u get that bit of information? |
Leebo24 From: Joined: January 3rd, 2005 Posts: 118 | This 'planet' was discovered years ago...old news. |
SlimyStrike From: (Eindhoven) Joined: October 25th, 2004 Posts: 179 | Old news?... |
pokemona From: (Barrie, Ontario) Joined: November 25th, 2002 Posts: 809 | #4 Thats was Senda yur talking about. |
elminster From: Joined: September 19th, 2002 Posts: 364 | Actually no, it has only just been clasiffied as a 'planet' officially.
Its current designation is 2003UB313.
Sedna is a planetoid about a million miles closer. |
BMAN100 From: (Ontario) Joined: March 6th, 2005 Posts: 68 | man they found that . well what ever it is ages ago. no offence , but its just a huge asteroid as far as I know |
RogMan74569 From: (Winston-Salem, NC) Joined: December 25th, 2004 Posts: 87 | It's been theorized there was a tenth planet with an even weirder orbit than Pluto...
I always had a hunch there was too. I'm glad bonified scientists proved my hunch true 
RogMan |
Danar Joined: December 28th, 2002 Posts: 77 | I got the hacker information from an AP story about the planet. If you do a quick search on google it'll turn up the story. #8 Planet X is just a theory, and a very poor one at that. No one has found anything in our solar system matching the description (a planet at least 3-4 times earth's mass in a highly elliptical orbit). This 10th "planet", not to be confused with X, is just a little ice ball about 1.5 times pluto's size and with a surface of frozen methane. |
NeoExelor From: (New York, New York) Joined: April 28th, 2004 Posts: 310 | When was Sedna classified a "Planetoid"?
Im still pretty sure its a planet. If it isnt, the new one isnt. They said Sedna was a part of a rock belt outside the system. If Sedna isnt, then why in hell would "2003UB313" be? |
the9thDoctor From: (Kendal) Joined: January 16th, 2004 Posts: 144 | There's been several 10th Planets discovered over the years if I recall correctly (probably don't, knowing me).
Wonder if they'll call it Mondas |
akula2ssn Joined: February 11th, 2005 Posts: 835 | Unfortunately, there is no real consensus on the definition of a planet. Some view this object as Kuiper Belt object instead of a planet. Infact many astronomers view Pluto as a Kuiper Belt object and not a planet. However, some view that since this new object is much larger than Pluto, that the term planet should be extended to it. As of yet the IAU has no agreement as to what constitutes a planet. The debate has been going on from 6 months to 5 years. It's pretty much because astronomers never defined the word "planet". |
MilleauRekiir From: (London) Joined: September 16th, 2003 Posts: 213 | The debates been going on for longer than five years - it began getting serious as long ago as when Pluto was found and also erupted when calculations of the total mass of the asteroid belt where made and a decision had to be taken on whether or not to classify it as a dead planet. It isn't thought to have been so.
Holst must be furious. Yet another one to put to music, he already lags behind by one... |
morgan0210 From: Joined: February 26th, 2003 Posts: 423 | It was pretty cool to hear about Quaoar and Sedna, but this is definately nice.
Danar, Pluto is considered a planet, but this thing is discovered and you're trying not to call it a planet? |
akula2ssn Joined: February 11th, 2005 Posts: 835 | Problem with defining what constitutes a planet is that we have a lot of them covering a wide range of sizes and compositions. While there are quite a few astronomers that challenge the classification of Pluto as a planet, most more or less consider Pluto a planet simply, because it is generally accepted by people to be b planet. |
When posting comments, you must follow these rules:- No "Yay I got First Post!" posts, no exceptions and no matter what other content the post has!
- No Pornographic Material. Any sexually oriented imagery or links to such content will not be tolerated.
- No Warez or Illegal Software. This includes linking to software, posting about it, and suggesting to get it.
- No Cursing or Swear words. We encourage you to use our comment sections as a forum to debate files, news, etc., but please use proper adjectives to express yourself. We will not tolerate abuse upon another member or author.
- No Attacks / Retaliation of any kind against a member, or group of members.
- Please do not advertise for other sites or forums here.
- Maximum of 3 smileys per regular member.
The high interactivity of this site should be considered a luxury, not a right. If you cannot follow these simple rules, you can and will be warned or banned from the comments, site or the entire network for any period of time. Now enjoy yourself and behave!
|